The Group’s assets that are subject to depreciation are analysed in terms of impairment whenever indications of impairment are identified.
An impairment loss is recognised in the amount by which the asset’s balance sheet value exceeds its recoverable value. The recoverable value is determined as the higher of the following two amounts: fair value less cost to sell or usable value (i.e. estimated present value of future cash flows that are expected to be obtained from further use of the asset or cash generating unit). For impairment analysis purposes, assets are grouped at the lowest level where it is possible to identify separate cash flows (cash generating units). Cash generating units are never larger than operating segments.
All impairment losses are recognised in profit or loss. Impairment losses may be reversed in subsequent periods (except for goodwill) if events occur that justify a lack of or change in impairment.
Recoverable value of tangible and intangible assets
Cash generating units are tested for impairment using a variety of assumptions, some of which are beyond the Group’s control. Significant changes in these estimates have an impact on impairment test results and, in consequence, on the Group’s financial position and financial results, described further below.
As at 30 September 2020, in connection with information and analyses concerning changes in the market prices of CO2 emission allowances, electricity, energy origin certificates and forecasts for macroeconomic indicators, ENEA Group carried out impairment tests for property, plant and equipment in areas involved in the generation of electricity, among others. Based on these tests, the necessity to recognise the following events was identified.
Based on the analysis, impairment losses were recognised on non-financial non-current assets at CGU Elektrownie Systemowe Kozienice amounting to PLN 2 881 174 thousand. This impairment loss reduced the Group’s net financial result by PLN 2 333 751 thousand. As at 30 June 2020, impairment losses on non-financial non-current assets at CGU Elektrownie Kozienice amounted to PLN 522 822 thousand. This impairment loss reduced the Group’s financial result by a total of PLN 423 486 thousand. The Group decided not to reverse the impairment losses on non-financial non-current assets that had been recognised in previous years
Presented below are the results of these impairment tests:
CGU [PLN 000s] | Recoverable value | Book value |
---|---|---|
CGU Elektrownie Systemowe Kozienice – ENEA Wytwarzanie’s generating assets at Świerże Górne | 4 447 689 | 7 358 863 |
CGU Wind – ENEA Nowa Energia’s wind-based generating assets | 511 214 | 331 617 |
CGU Hydro – ENEA Nowa Energia’s hydro-based generating assets | 359 466 | 190 576 |
CGU Biogas – ENEA Nowa Energia’s biogas-based generating assets | 483 | 1 585 |
CGU Elektrownie Systemowe Połaniec – ENEA Elektrownia Połaniec generating assets (coal-based sources) | 1 111 854 | 1 113 768 |
CGU Zielony Blok – ENEA Elektrownia Połaniec generating assets (biomass unit) | 1 332 347 | 284 053 |
CGU Białystok – ENEA Ciepło’s generating assets | 798 828 | 699 754 |
The recoverable value of each CGU was estimated on the basis of useful value using the discounted cash flows approach based on financial projections.
The following forecast periods were used for testing the CGUs:
Presented below are the key assumptions used in impairment tests:
The sensitivity analysis shows that significant factors having impact on the estimated recoverable values of CGUs include: discount rates, inflation, electricity prices and CO2 emission allowance prices. Future financial results and thus the recoverable amounts of CGUs will also be driven by the prices of energy origin certificates, coal, heat and biomass prices.
The following table shows the value impact of selected factors on the total recoverable value (output value) of CGUs:
Change in assumptions | -0.5 p.p. | Output value | +0.5 p.p. |
---|---|---|---|
Change in recoverable value | 655 042 | 8 591 881 | (550 018) |
– CGU Elektrownie Systemowe Kozienice | 296 343 | 4 477 689 | (251 907) |
– CGU Wind | 25 235 | 511 214 | (23 423) |
– CGU Hydro | 45 476 | 359 466 | (36 985) |
– CGU Biogas | 4 | 483 | (4) |
– CGU Elektrownie Systemowe Połaniec | 38 912 | 1 111 854 | (37 136) |
– CGU Zielony Blok | 34 101 | 1 332 347 | (32 648) |
– CGU Białystok | 214 971 | 798 828 | (167 915) |
Change in assumptions | -0,5 p.p. | Starting value | +0,5 p.p. |
---|---|---|---|
Change in recoverable value | (610 965) | 8 591 881 | 665 972 |
– CGU Elektrownie Systemowe Kozienice | (314 519) | 4 477 689 | 344 045 |
– CGU Wind | (23 503) | 511 214 | 25 009 |
– CGU Hydro | (31 671) | 359 466 | 34 573 |
– CGU Biogas | (2) | 483 | 2 |
– CGU Elektrownie Systemowe Połaniec | (36 496) | 1 111 854 | 36 978 |
– CGU Zielony Blok | (31 163) | 1 332 347 | 32 316 |
– CGU Białystok | (173 611) | 798 828 | 193 050 |
Change in assumptions | -1,0% | Starting value | +1,0% |
---|---|---|---|
Change in recoverable value | (1 255 958) | 8 591 881 | 1 228 269 |
– CGU Elektrownie Systemowe Kozienice | (969 758) | 4 477 689 | 953 523 |
– CGU Wind | (6 220) | 511 214 | 6 220 |
– CGU Hydro | (9 046) | 359 466 | 9 046 |
– CGU Biogas | (59) | 483 | 59 |
– CGU Elektrownie Systemowe Połaniec | (183 229) | 1 111 854 | 172 678 |
– CGU Zielony Blok | (54 709) | 1 332 347 | 53 805 |
– CGU Białystok | (32 937) | 798 828 | 32 938 |
Change in assumptions | -1,0% | Starting value | +1,0% |
---|---|---|---|
Change in recoverable value | 347 268 | 8 591 881 | (349 335) |
– CGU Elektrownie Systemowe Kozienice | 294 493 | 4 477 689 | (295 372) |
– CGU Wind | – | 511 214 | – |
– CGU Hydro | – | 359 466 | – |
– CGU Biogas | – | 483 | – |
– CGU Elektrownie Systemowe Połaniec | 46 054 | 1 111 854 | (47 241) |
– CGU Zielony Blok | – | 1 332 347 | – |
– CGU Białystok | 6 721 | 798 828 | (6 722) |
The Group performed a periodic assessment of asset impairment indications in the Mining segment (LWB) in accordance with IAS 36 Impairment of Assets. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, which forces companies to operate in volatile, entirely unusual and unprecedented conditions, analysing these indications must be done especially carefully. Performing this evaluation for the purposes of the consolidated financial statements for 2020, the Group, based on an analysis of the current economic and market situation, believes that LWB’s current market capitalisation remains below the balance sheet value of its net assets. It should be noted that this indication was already present at the end of the previous financial year and was the main reason for an impairment test performed as at 31 December 2019. Despite the fact that the full-scale pandemic took place in 2020, this does not constitute the main indication of possible impairment of non-current assets, rather merely an additional indication confirming the need to perform an impairment test.
During 2020 (in comparison with the end of the previous financial year) the share price and thus also market capitalisation continued to decline, although not as substantially. According to the Group, this situation mainly stems from factors that are beyond its control such as political factors and the EU’s climate policy, and partly also low share liquidity and low free-float, as well as the economic slowdown brought on by the coronavirus pandemic. In connection with the above, despite the fact that the company’s non-current assets were tested for impairment at the end of 2019 and at the end of June 2020, the Group is required to perform an impairment test for the Mining segment also at the end of 2020.
Due to the inability to determine fair values for a very large group of assets for which there is no active market and no comparable transactions, the recoverable values of these assets were determined by estimating their useful values using the discounted cash flow approach based on the Group’s financial projections for 2021-2051.
Presented in the table below are the results of this impairment test:
CGU [PLN 000s] – as at 31 December 2020 | Recoverable value |
Book value |
---|---|---|
CGU Mining | 3 099 059 | 2 818 172 |
The key assumptions used in estimating the value in use of the tested assets are presented below:
The sensitivity analysis shows that significant factors having impact on the estimated recoverable values of CGUs include: discount rate, prices of coal for energy-generation purposes and the level of sales. Results of the analysis of the model’s sensitivity (change in recoverable value) on changes in key assumptions are presented below.
Change in assumptions | -0.5 p.p. | Starting value | +0.5 p.p. |
---|---|---|---|
Change in recoverable value | 189 228 | 3 099 059 | (174 898) |
Change in assumptions | -0,5% | Starting value | +0,5% |
---|---|---|---|
Change in recoverable value | (106 236) | 3 099 059 | 106 236 |
Change in assumptions | -0,5 p.p. | Starting value | +0,5 p.p. |
---|---|---|---|
Change in recoverable value | 258 349 | 3 099 059 | (280 455) |
Furthermore, being aware of the significant impact of the effect of scale and optimal use of resources on LWB’s financial and operating results, and taking into account the trend to move away from hard coal, the Group also analysed changes in recoverable values in the model in the case of a reduction in the output of coal for sales purposes during the entire forecast period by 5% (vs. the existing recoverable resources, for example if it should become necessary to shut down a mine earlier). The results of the analysis of changes in recoverable values are presented in the following table. However, it should be noted that if demand is reduced or other factors that can have an adverse impact on the overall level of output materialise, the Group is automatically taking appropriate optimisation activities in order to ensure the most effective use of resources and maximise economic benefits at a given level of production
Change in assumptions | -5% | Starting value |
---|---|---|
Change in recoverable value | (81 791) | 3 099 059 |